Case study
Case study: a burst heating pipe in an Antrim rental property
Client-supplied and verified, 2026-08-04.
- Property
- privately rented semi-detached house, Antrim
- Cause
- burst pipe in the first-floor heating system, March 2026
- Settlement
- £18,575
- covering trace and access and the resulting water damage
The tenants noticed water dripping through the kitchen ceiling. The source was not visible. Both the bathroom and the gas boiler were on the first floor, so the leak could have come from the bathroom plumbing or from the central heating, and nothing could be agreed until that was settled. Access had to be arranged around both the landlord's and the tenants' availability.
We arranged the investigation and assessed the property: leak detection to find the source, a water damage survey, moisture mapping across the affected areas, photographs and video, and a written record of the damage and its likely timeline. The investigation confirmed a burst pipe in the heating system. Moisture had travelled through the first-floor structure into the kitchen ceiling and the surrounding materials, so the visible dripping was only part of the loss and the readings were what established the full extent.
The insurer's loss adjuster then argued negligence, on the basis that the leak should have been found and reported sooner. We challenged that. The failed pipe was concealed within the heating system, and neither the tenants nor the landlord could reasonably have known it had burst until water appeared in the kitchen below. This was not wear and tear that had been ignored: the boiler had been serviced recently and the property held a current Gas Safe certificate, which supported the landlord's position that the system had been responsibly maintained.
Using the moisture readings, the damage patterns and the site evidence, we established when the leak had most likely occurred, and prepared a written submission for the insurer setting out the confirmed cause, the evidence that the failure was hidden, the moisture mapping results, the photographs and video, the maintenance and servicing records, the trace and access work required and the scope of the repairs. That evidence showed the tenants had reported the problem as soon as there was any reasonable indication of a leak.
Because this was a tenanted property, we arranged inspections and meetings around the tenants' availability and kept them informed about access and progress, while handling the communication with the insurer and the loss adjuster. The claim settled at £18,575, including the trace and access costs and the water damage.
Why it matters: a concealed heating leak is exactly the claim an insurer will characterise as gradual damage or late reporting, and a landlord is more exposed to that argument than an owner-occupier because they are not in the property. What answered it here was the maintenance record, the moisture evidence and the timeline, which is why the servicing paperwork is worth keeping and why the readings need taking early.
Trace and access is the part of the policy that pays to find a hidden leak. Our guide to trace and access cover explains the limits insurers apply.